Archive for: November, 2012

How to write a grant

Nov 14 2012 Published by under Uncategorized

Maybe the title is misleading. In this post I will not be talking about how to organize, structure and present ideas in your grant. This is not about what you put in your grant. That's up to you. What I will be talking about is what your grant should look like. Recently I've been dealing with graduate students putting together two-page graduate fellowships for the NSF which are due, like, this week. This is typically the first taste of grant writing students get, and it shows. Not only are thoughts disorganized, ideas vague and descriptions wordy, but the drafts often just look like crap. I've gotten everything from 2 pages crammed with impenetrable walls of text, or grants that are one page over the limit or something so sparse and thin that while it fills the 2 pages, there's about zero content. And of course I wouldn't expect any different, since these folks have had no prior experience or guidance. One thing that is often overlooked in grant workshops is how to make your grants more readable and pleasing to the eye. Most granting agencies have strict limitations on font types and sizes you could use, as well as specific margin sizes and line spacings. But even within these constraints there are good and bad practices regarding how you format your grant.

What follows is a miniguide of practices I follow to maximize the amount of space to put information in, without sacrificing readability and pissing off all of your caffeine-addled reviewers. I won't even go on about which font is better, people have strong feelings about what works and which doesn't and these arguments run deep. I will just tell you how I format my grants, I'm sure you can adapt these tips to your personal font preferences:

1. First and foremost, keep in mind that grants have a page limit for a reason. If the limit is two pages, then write two pages worth of grant, not six and try to fit it all in into two. But even if you are conscientious about page limits, there's always that extra paragraph that you want to add describing that extra method, or alternative interpretations of your results, or whatever. How do you squeeze this in?

2. Turn on hyphenation: This will not only shave off a few lines from your proposal (up to half a page for a 10 page proposal), but it will make your right margins neater. It is never a good idea to turn on right justification, because although the text looks prettier, it makes it hard to read. With hyphenation, it will tighten up the right unjustified margin without detracting from ease of reading.

3. Use several short paragraphs and don't skimp on headings: Often I've seen grants with page-long single-paragraph walls of text, with headings embedded in bold lettering within the text. While this impenetrable wall might be useful for keeping out the wildlings, it is very difficult to read. So use headings to organize your proposal, write several short paragraphs containing one or two ideas, this makes it so much more readable and increases blessed white-space on the page. "But," you say, "I can't afford to waste all those empty lines between paragraphs and after headings?" True, these two things use up precious space, but one way in which you can minimize the use of empty line-space, yet still open up your text, is to set spacing following each paragraph to be 6 points. That way, you have a half line of space between paragraphs to make it look good, but you save a few lines.

4. Use 11 point Arial and set line spacing to be exactly 12 points: This combo will pass muster of most spacing requirements (certainly NIH and NSF), yet minimize amount of space used and remain highly readable. When you set your word processor to "single space" it usually uses 13 or 14 pts, which is necessary for 12 pt font, but with 11 pt font, 12 pt spacing is fine. Keep in mind that 11 pt Times New Roman is too small, and 11 pt Georgia will look crappy with 12pt spacing.

5. Don't use gratuitous figures: While figures are good for presenting preliminary data and outlining experimental design, use them judiciously. Often they are not necessary and take up a bunch of space that could be used for clarifying your methodology, emphasizing your key points or what not. If you do use a figure, put it and its legend in a text-box and wrap the main text around it, leaving about 6 points of white space around it. For the legend you can get away with 9 pt Arial, maybe even 8pt if you are really tight for space.

6. Remove danglers: Often you will have in the last line of the paragraph one or two words taking up an entire line. Try to rearrange and rewrite some of the preceding text so that these dangling words are carried back into the preceding line.

That's it!  These tips and tricks will allow you to maximize use of space yet have high-readability. And while they will save you a few lines, perhaps half a page, they will not turn a 9 page proposal into a 6 pager. For this you will have to work on eliminating unnecessary or duplicated sentences and even whole paragraphs, which is much, much harder.

Do you have any other tips and tricks you'd like to share?

21 responses so far

Like Mitt

Nov 07 2012 Published by under Uncategorized

You know, I don't really feel bad for Mitt Romney. Because even thought he lost the election, he can just go back to being, well, Mitt Romney. Living the life he's always led. I often think, why can't we all live more like Mitt? Jet-setting and stuff. So I've started to think of ways in which I could acquire a lifestyle more like Mitt's.

Fortunately, I just got invited to a "brainstorming power-lunch" about how us shlumpy scientists could form partnerships with well-dressed industry folks to make mucho dinero! This one seems specifically focused to my broad area of research, and the university has invited a couple of local industry folks working in our area as well as some venture capitalists. I can understand why the uni is keen on holding such meetings, because universities can't function on indirect costs, tuition and fundraising alone, and their intellectual capital is supposedly highly marketable.

So should I start picking out my new jet and livin' la vida loca? I don't think so. I may be naive here, but I just don't see it. I don't see how any of my research make any money for anyone. Yea, I know some folks who have started companies and filed patents, and maybe some of those folks have made some extra cash from these enterprises, and yes, maybe an even smaller subset has made a not-so-insubstantial amount of money. But still, our research is so basic and far from anything immediately clinical, that I just don't see it. And it's not that I'm against this sort of stuff, the purity of science and what not. No, I would love to cash in on all our hard work, and the only way basic research can become truly translational is through such partnerships. Unless the government gets into the drug-development business. But with my research I just don't see it. Who knows, maybe these folks will illuminate me, and at the least I get a free lunch.

How about you, readers, do you often think about how you could monetize your research? Have you tried? If so have you been successful?

3 responses so far

Calaveras 3.0

Nov 02 2012 Published by under Uncategorized

In México, November 2 is Día de Muertos or Day of the Dead. One venerable tradition is to write little obituaries for living people you know with a little skeleton of themselves, or a sugar skull with their name to accompany it. Newspapers will write funny obituaries, usually in verse of politicians and other public figures. These fake obits are known as "Calaveras". For the last couple of years, I've written some calaveras of a few fellow science bloggers. To continue the tradition I'm happy to present a new set of calavers of some fellow bloggers I've had the pleasure to interact with in the previous year. Enjoy!

Pobrecita SciCurious, killed by curiosity.

No matter how much she would try,

Death could not evade poor old Sci.

We tried to save her from the monster brain,

that chased her, again and again.

But one day as she was writing el blog,

monster brain caught her, as she tripped over a stupid log!


Prof-like Substance, R.I.P.

Prof-like substance was always confusing.

What sort of substance makes a professor?

He wrote this blog, about how academia was a slog,

until he died by falling into his substantial processor.


PalMD, fightin' hacks and quacks!

Dr. Pal has finally gone underground.

Not in a white coat but under a mound.

He was fighting off quacks, chiropractors and hacks.

When a homeopath fired a round of projectiles.

Although the bullets were diluted a million times over,

poor  Pal was still felled by placebo effectiles.

73 responses so far